Thursday, March 17, 2016

Video Clips - Period 1 Mock USSC Hearing

Kelvin Dean (Court Clerk) calling the court to order.

John De Lorimier (Attorney for the Petitioner) introducing himself to the court.

Akbar Mahmood (Attorney for the Respondent) arguing before the court.

 
Tino Maese (Associate Justice) asking petitioner a question.

 
Leila Hamawi (Associate Justice) asking respondent a question.

My Friends Argued For the Wrong Side

I personally like the students that argued in favor of the respondent, but I think that what they said was wrong. Punishing a kid for carrying a kirpan onto school grounds is not right. I feel the kid should be punished if he attacks another student, but not for just carrying the kirpan.

I Disagree with the Court's Ruling

I am shocked and appalled with the ruling of the court.  I would expect the court to uphold the basic rights of the citizens of this country.  The first amendment clearly protects a citizen's right to worship how they choose.  This ceremonial dagger is a form of worship to the Sikh religion.  Sikh's cannot worship properly without the possesion of a kirpan.  The Sikh doctrine states it is meant for self defense and defense of others.  To say this small, dull, AND sheathed kirpan is a threat to the children and teachers of the Titanville School District is preposterous.  It is also insulting to suggest that Sikh's carry this with ill intent.  I hope in the near future this decision is overruled.  I cannot picture an America where people are still persecuted because of their beliefs.

A Word From The Winning Attorney

On behalf of myself and my co-council, Mark Uriarte,  we are ecstatic with the decision that the court has made in Doe vs. Titanville case. Thank you to all those who voted in favor of the respondent!

A Ridiculous Ruling

I am shocked by the court's ruling. The respondent's argument was weak and poorly delivered. I think that if a certain religion requires that a kirpan must be on the person, that it is unconstitutional for a school to take that away from them.  How can the court say otherwise.  If, by some slim chance, the kirpan was used as a weapon, that individual should be punished as opposed to the entire sikh religion. The court is wrong in every way and I am appalled that this case ended the way it did.  I have lost faith in our court system, these people were not meant to make important decisions such as this.

Tuesday, March 15, 2016

Split home!!!!!

When interviewing my family members I came across different viewpoints that made me really think much deeper into the kirpan case.  Here are the responses of my father, mother, and 21 year old sister.

Father:  When I asked my dad he said as long as it doesn't violate current laws it should be ok.  And when it came to this case he sided with the Respondent telling me that having a weapon at school violates US laws.  When I told him how the kirpan is not a weapon to Sikhs he still thought it to be too dangerous for kids to bring blades to school.

Mother:  My mother thought differently than my dad did.  She thinks that in order to be able to bring a kirpan to school the student must go through a screening process taking tests to help find out if the student is at risk for a mental illness that would cause him or her to act irrationally and use the kirpan as a weapon.

Sister:  Alex, my sister, told me that she doesn't think that anybody should be able to wear any religious items at school.  Even though it is unconstitutional, she believes that the only way to make schools safe is to take this radical step.

And My Opinion:  I think that he should be able to take his kirpan to school day in and day out.  Maybe there should be some restrictions such as having to lock the kirpans sheath on it so it cannot be taken out of the sheath until the student is at home.  Or even Sikh students should have to put their kirpans in a thick bag and have it sewn shut before the student can set foot on campus. There is no black or white answer to this issue and the grey area is immense, making any decision will make someone unhappy.

Monday, March 14, 2016

Photos From Mock USSC Hearing (Period 4)

Attorney for the Petitioner: Grace Miller
Justice: Daniel Hernandez
Justice: Jack Liu
Justice: Charlene Wu
Justice: Max Abughazaleh
Justice: Bryson Smith
City Councilman: Steven Huang
Blogger: Elie Lahey
Chief Justice: Austin Huang
Court Clerk: Sayuzhdri Sarrafpour

Attorney for the Respondent: Paul Callahan